By April Lanux

This February, teachers, students, historians, and many others will extol the virtues of African American inventors during Black History Month. The remarkable inventions such as the first portable air conditioner, the gas mask, the automatic elevator door, traffic signs — were all invented by Black people. The impact of these inventions—not only on everyday life, but on our economy—is astounding. How much more impactful would those creators and inventors have been if they did not have to struggle against the racial barriers and economic inequity that blocked their potential? How many more inventions would they have created if they had sufficient access to capital during the research start up and distribution stages? What about today?

While there is no shortage of talented Black founders, creatives, and innovators, research reveals that bias continues to prevent equal footing, competition, and autonomy for those individuals. There are significant barriers and disparities that hinder the growth of Black innovators, including inadequate access to capital, inequitable legislation, regulatory hindrances, and limited philanthropic support.

Unfortunately, the barriers and disparities faced by these Americans and the failure to support Black innovators stunt economic growth for all. Systemic failures and policy inaction prevent full capitalization of the potential of these creators, as 40 percent of revenue for Black businesses is used to resolve debt. According to McKinsey & Company, achieving racial parity between White and Black businesses alone would add $290 billion to the economy. At a time when the demand for Black businesses and Black brands is rising, only a fraction of Black businesses make it to their third year of operation. Additionally, only 4 percent of Black-owned businesses are still in operation after three and a half years of operation, compared to 55.5 percent for all other businesses.

Research continually points to the lack of adequate investment as the primary reason for the closing of these businesses. Raising capital is difficult for any entrepreneur, but this challenge is even harder for minority groups.

Majority Black women-owned firms grew 67 percent from 2007 to 2012, compared to 27 percent for all women, and grew by 50 percent from 2014 to 2019, representing the highest growth rate of any female demographic during that time. Black women owned firms, however, have the lowest capital investment. According to research commissioned by American Express, 4 million new jobs and $981 billion in revenue could be added to the U.S. economy if the average revenue of women of color-owned businesses matched those of white women owned businesses.

During the reckoning of Black Lives Matter in 2020, numerous corporations, tech companies, and financial institutions committed to supporting the growth of Black wealth through investment in Black innovators and tech startups. Despite the promises made by investment firms, venture capitalists, angel investors and technology companies, the inequities persist. The continued inequities in access to capital impede sustainability. Black founders received only 1.2% of a record $147 billion venture capital dollars invested in U.S. startups in the first half of 2021.

Given these circumstances, I have continued to implore Black innovators to utilize grants, crowdfunding campaigns, Small Business Administration (SBA) Loans, and Community Development Financial Institutions (CDFI). The reality, however, is that while these alternate funding sources come with their advantages and disadvantages, they still do not place Black innovators on equal footing with their counterparts.

That is why, from a government perspective, it is incumbent that I and my colleagues, particularly those in the Congressional Caucus of Black Innovation, remain vigilant and advocate for legislation and regulatory action (particularly after passage of the COMPETES Act) that provide the programmatic, regulatory, and funding support necessary to advance Black wealth creation in the technology space.

As we celebrate the history of Black America this month, it is important to understand and appreciate the journey that Black innovators in history have taken—especially because of the way their contributions continue to influence, improve, and secure all of our futures. Although Black founders, creatives, and innovators have been disenfranchised and refused mainstream funding for ages, history has continued to demonstrate the power and resilience of our Black innovators.

Just imagine the exponential benefit to the U.S. economy through jobs, increased family wealth, tax revenues, productivity, and of course innovation if corporations, tech companies, and financial institutions who committed in the reckoning of 2020 to support the growth of Black wealth through investment in Black innovators and tech startups were to follow through with their promise. This would be a tremendous boon not just to the Black community, but our nation at large.

By April Lanux

A US lawsuit filed on behalf of LinkedIn Premium users accuses the social media platform of sharing their private messages with other companies to train artificial intelligence (AI) models.

It alleges that in August last year, the world's largest professional social networking website "quietly" introduced a privacy setting, automatically opting users in to a programme that allowed third parties to use their personal data to train AI.

It also accuses the Microsoft-owned company of concealing its actions a month later by changing its privacy policy to say user information could be disclosed for AI training purposes.

A LinkedIn spokesperson told BBC News that "these are false claims with no merit".

The filing also said LinkedIn changed its 'frequently asked questions' section to say that users could choose not to share data for AI purposes but that doing so would not affect training that had already taken place.

"LinkedIn's actions... indicate a pattern of attempting to cover its tracks," the lawsuit said.

"This behaviour suggests that LinkedIn was fully aware that it had violated its contractual promises and privacy standards and aimed to minimise public scrutiny".

The lawsuit was filed in a California federal court on behalf of a LinkedIn Premium user and "all others" in a similar situation.

It seeks $1,000 (£812) per user for alleged violations of the US federal Stored Communications Act as well as an unspecified amount for breach of contract and California's unfair competition law.

According to an email LinkedIn sent to its users last year, it has not enabled user data sharing for AI purposes in the UK, the European Economic Area and Switzerland.

LinkedIn has more than one billion users around the world, with almost a quarter of them in the US.

In 2023, the company attracted $1.7bn in revenue from premium subscriptions.

It has also said that the number of premium subscribers has been growing rapidly as it continues to add more AI features.